Sit Uas 👑 💎

The final 25-item SIT-UAS demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.84) and inter-rater agreement for scoring (Fleiss’ κ = 0.76). SIT-UAS scores correlated significantly with instructor-rated non-technical competence (r = 0.61, p < .001) and predicted simulator mission success (OR = 3.4 per SD increase).

Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) present candidates with realistic, work-related scenarios and ask them to rate or choose among possible actions. SJTs predict job performance in many high-stakes professions (medicine, air traffic control) by assessing procedural knowledge and tacit decision-making rules (Lievens & Sackett, 2012). However, no validated SJT currently exists for UAS operators. sit uas

Scenario: You are operating a UAS beyond visual line of sight. The ground control station displays a “Link Quality Low” warning, and you have not received a telemetry update for 12 seconds. Your mission objective is to survey a flooded area. What do you do? SJTs predict job performance in many high-stakes professions

Development and Validation of a Situational Judgement Test (SIT-UAS) for Unmanned Aircraft System Operators: Predicting Non-Technical Skills in Remote Piloting The ground control station displays a “Link Quality

Correct (expert rated best): B (Immediate RTH – prioritizes safety over mission) Least effective: A (Continued flight risks loss of aircraft)

The SIT-UAS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing judgement in UAS operations. It offers a practical, low-fidelity alternative for selection and training needs analysis.

A. Continue the mission, hoping the link recovers. B. Immediately initiate return-to-home (RTH). C. Climb to higher altitude to improve line of sight. D. Wait 30 seconds, then command RTH if no recovery.