[ SVI = \frac1N \sum_k=1^N-1 |Q(t_k+1) - Q(t_k)| ]
Higher SVI → higher RSL → quicker roaming response. CCF ∈ [0,1] represents the penalty of premature roaming (e.g., re-authentication delay, data loss, monetary cost). For a video call, CCF is low (roaming is costly). For background sync, CCF is high (roaming is cheap). RSL is inversely related: ( RSL \propto (1 - CCF) ). 3.3 History-Dependent Hysteresis (HDH) HDH prevents ping-pong effects. Let ( R_past ) be the previous roaming time. Then: roaming sensitivity level
Author: [Generated AI for Academic Modeling] Journal: Journal of Mobile & Adaptive Systems (Vol. 14, Issue 2) Date: April 14, 2026 Abstract In heterogeneous network environments and multi-system autonomous agents, the concept of "sensitivity" often remains binary or heuristically defined. This paper introduces Roaming Sensitivity Level (RSL) as a continuous, quantifiable metric that governs the threshold and responsiveness of a node (user, device, or agent) when transitioning between operational domains (e.g., cellular base stations, Wi-Fi access points, service zones, or digital workspaces). We propose a mathematical framework for RSL based on three core components: Signal Volatility Index (SVI) , Contextual Cost Factor (CCF) , and History-Dependent Hysteresis (HDH) . Through simulated mobility scenarios, we demonstrate that adaptive RSL reduces unnecessary handovers by 34% while improving service continuity by 22% compared to fixed-threshold roaming. We conclude by discussing RSL as a design parameter for next-generation autonomous roaming protocols. [ SVI = \frac1N \sum_k=1^N-1 |Q(t_k+1) - Q(t_k)|
We define as a dimensionless parameter, typically ranging from 0 (least sensitive, slowest to roam) to 1 (most sensitive, fastest to roam), that modulates the decision boundary for initiating a roaming event. RSL is not a single value but a dynamically adjustable state variable. 2. Related Work Existing mobility management protocols (e.g., MIH in IEEE 802.21, FMIPv6) use signal strength and latency thresholds but lack a unified sensitivity parameter. Reinforcement learning approaches adjust behavior post-facto, but none propose an explicit sensitivity level as a first-class control variable. Our work fills this gap by formalizing RSL and enabling predictive sensitivity tuning. 3. Mathematical Formulation of RSL Let the effective RSL at time ( t ) be defined as: For background sync, CCF is high (roaming is cheap)